[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180418092634.13488a33@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:26:34 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
Cc: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@...el.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SRIOV switchdev mode BoF minutes
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:15:29 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > A similar issue exists on multi-host for PFs, right? If one of the
> > hosts is down do we still show their PF repr? IMHO yes.
>
> I would agree with that as well. With today's model the VF reps are
> created once a PF is put into switchdev mode, but I'm still working out
> how we want to consider whether or not a PF rep for the other domains is
> created locally or not and also how one can determine which domain is in
> control.
>
> Permanent config options (like NVRAM settings) could easily handle which
> domain is in control, but that still does not mean that PF reps must be
> created automatically, does it?
The control domain is tricky. I'm not sure I understand how you could
not have a PF rep for remote domains, though. How do you configure
switching to the PF netdev if there is no rep?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists