[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874lk8wj1j.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:55:52 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avagin@...tuozzo.com,
ktkhai@...tuozzo.com, serge@...lyn.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] netns: isolate seqnums to use per-netns locks
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com> writes:
> Now that it's possible to have a different set of uevents in different
> network namespaces, per-network namespace uevent sequence numbers are
> introduced. This increases performance as locking is now restricted to the
> network namespace affected by the uevent rather than locking
> everything.
Numbers please. I personally expect that the netlink mc_list issues
will swamp any benefit you get from this.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists