netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/11] udp gso

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180418.132407.1643650484665622484.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:24:07 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     pabeni@...hat.com
Cc:     willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/11] udp gso

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:17:54 +0200

> When testing with Spectre/Meltdown mitigation in places, I expect
> that the most relevant part of the gain is due to the single syscall
> per burst.

I was going to say exactly this.

Batching schemes that were borderline beneficial before spectre/meltdown
are more worthwhile now.