[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180418011144.71697-1-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 18:11:44 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: frags: fix a lockdep false positive
lockdep does not know that the locks used by IPv4 defrag
and IPv6 reassembly units are of different classes.
It complains because of following chains :
1) sch_direct_xmit() (lock txq->_xmit_lock)
dev_hard_start_xmit()
xmit_one()
dev_queue_xmit_nit()
packet_rcv_fanout()
ip_check_defrag()
ip_defrag()
spin_lock() (lock frag queue spinlock)
2) ip6_input_finish()
ipv6_frag_rcv() (lock frag queue spinlock)
ip6_frag_queue()
icmpv6_param_prob() (lock txq->_xmit_lock at some point)
We could add lockdep annotations, but we also can make sure IPv6
calls icmpv6_param_prob() only after the release of the frag queue spinlock,
since this naturally makes frag queue spinlock a leaf in lock hierarchy.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
Note do David: I chose net-next because of recent changes in net-next,
and because it is a false positive, but can respin for net tree
if you prefer. Thanks !
net/ipv6/reassembly.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
index 2cdf3dcf8c2c1f7629154f71a7bd199b2bf05fd1..b939b94e7e91ddae1552f0b6f6a54c42ab180615 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
@@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ fq_find(struct net *net, __be32 id, const struct ipv6hdr *hdr, int iif)
}
static int ip6_frag_queue(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct frag_hdr *fhdr, int nhoff)
+ struct frag_hdr *fhdr, int nhoff,
+ u32 *prob_offset)
{
struct sk_buff *prev, *next;
struct net_device *dev;
@@ -179,11 +180,7 @@ static int ip6_frag_queue(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
((u8 *)(fhdr + 1) - (u8 *)(ipv6_hdr(skb) + 1)));
if ((unsigned int)end > IPV6_MAXPLEN) {
- __IP6_INC_STATS(net, __in6_dev_get_safely(skb->dev),
- IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
- icmpv6_param_prob(skb, ICMPV6_HDR_FIELD,
- ((u8 *)&fhdr->frag_off -
- skb_network_header(skb)));
+ *prob_offset = (u8 *)&fhdr->frag_off - skb_network_header(skb);
return -1;
}
@@ -214,10 +211,7 @@ static int ip6_frag_queue(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
/* RFC2460 says always send parameter problem in
* this case. -DaveM
*/
- __IP6_INC_STATS(net, __in6_dev_get_safely(skb->dev),
- IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
- icmpv6_param_prob(skb, ICMPV6_HDR_FIELD,
- offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, payload_len));
+ *prob_offset = offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, payload_len);
return -1;
}
if (end > fq->q.len) {
@@ -519,15 +513,22 @@ static int ipv6_frag_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
iif = skb->dev ? skb->dev->ifindex : 0;
fq = fq_find(net, fhdr->identification, hdr, iif);
if (fq) {
+ u32 prob_offset = 0;
int ret;
spin_lock(&fq->q.lock);
fq->iif = iif;
- ret = ip6_frag_queue(fq, skb, fhdr, IP6CB(skb)->nhoff);
+ ret = ip6_frag_queue(fq, skb, fhdr, IP6CB(skb)->nhoff,
+ &prob_offset);
spin_unlock(&fq->q.lock);
inet_frag_put(&fq->q);
+ if (prob_offset) {
+ __IP6_INC_STATS(net, __in6_dev_get_safely(skb->dev),
+ IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS);
+ icmpv6_param_prob(skb, ICMPV6_HDR_FIELD, prob_offset);
+ }
return ret;
}
--
2.17.0.484.g0c8726318c-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists