netdev - Re: 答复: [PATCH][net-next] net: ip tos cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180419.112740.414437419078279622.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:27:40 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     lirongqing@...du.com
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
        ast@...com, brakmo@...com
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH][net-next] net: ip tos cgroup

From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 04:56:09 +0000

> I think this method is easier to use than BPF, and more efficient

Ease of use is arguable, but for anything bpf this is going to
steadily improve over time therefore it is not much of an argument
against using bpf.

And I disagree on the efficient aspect as well.