[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180419051858.bc7wwmjotwwfmvky@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:18:58 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: sunlianwen <sunlw.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add mutex_unlock on xfrm4_protocol_register
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 09:08:57AM +0800, sunlianwen wrote:
> The function of xfrm4_protocol_register() don't release
> the mutx lock, which potential cause deadlock.
Can you please explain how this can happen?
>
> Signed-off-by: Lianwen Sun <sunlw.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c
> index 8dd0e6ab8606..1ee34edef9d2 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c
> @@ -240,6 +240,10 @@ int xfrm4_protocol_register(struct xfrm4_protocol *handler,
>
> ret = 0;
>
> + mutex_unlock(&xfrm4_protocol_mutex);
> +
> + return ret;
> +
> err:
> mutex_unlock(&xfrm4_protocol_mutex);
Did you test this patch?
I'm sure you did not. You return before the protocol
is registered, this breaks IPsec for IPv4 completely.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists