netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the failover framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180420.114753.508240232662001454.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:47:53 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     mst@...hat.com
Cc:     stephen@...workplumber.org, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
        alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, kubakici@...pl, jasowang@...hat.com,
        loseweigh@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event
 handling code to use the failover framework

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:43:54 +0300

> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 08:28:02AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> Plus, DPDK is now dependent on existing model.
> 
> DPDK does the kernel bypass thing, doesn't it? Why does the kernel care?

+1