netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] samples/bpf: Fix typo in comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180420155213.2867fcf5@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 15:52:13 +0200
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] samples/bpf: Fix typo in comment

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:21:16 +0100
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 02:10:04PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:34:02 +0800 Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > Fix typo by replacing 'iif' with 'if'.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  samples/bpf/bpf_load.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c
> > > index bebe418..28e4678 100644
> > > --- a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c
> > > +++ b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c
> > > @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int load_elf_maps_section(struct bpf_map_data *maps, int maps_shndx,
> > >  			continue;
> > >  		if (sym[nr_maps].st_shndx != maps_shndx)
> > >  			continue;
> > > -		/* Only increment iif maps section */
> > > +		/* Only increment if maps section */
> > >  		nr_maps++;
> > >  	}  
> > 
> > This was actually not a typo from my side.
> > 
> > With 'iif' I mean 'if and only if' ... but it doesn't matter much.  
> 
> I think 'if and only if' is more commonly abbreviated 'iff' isn't it?

Ah, yes![1]  -- then it *is* actually a typo! - LOL

I'm fine with changing this to "if" :-)


[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer