[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180423081948.36c9c7a0@xeon-e3>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:19:48 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 199469] New: Regression in 32-bit-compat dev_ioctl due to
bf4405737f9f85a06db2b0ce5d76a818b61992e2
I think this has already been addressed. But forwarding for sure.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 01:26:46 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: [Bug 199469] New: Regression in 32-bit-compat dev_ioctl due to bf4405737f9f85a06db2b0ce5d76a818b61992e2
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199469
Bug ID: 199469
Summary: Regression in 32-bit-compat dev_ioctl due to
bf4405737f9f85a06db2b0ce5d76a818b61992e2
Product: Networking
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 4.16.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc28.x86_64
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: Other
Assignee: stephen@...workplumber.org
Reporter: robert@...llahan.org
Regression: No
Created attachment 275501
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=275501&action=edit
Test program
The commit says
Once upon a time net/socket.c:dev_ifsioc() used to handle SIOCSHWTSTAMP and
SIOCSIFMAP. These have different native and compat layout, so the format
conversion had been needed. In 2009 these two cases had been taken out,
turning the rest into a convoluted way to calling sock_do_ioctl(). We copy
compat structure into native one, call sock_do_ioctl() on that and copy
the result back for the in/out ioctls. No layout transformation anywhere,
so we might as well just call sock_do_ioctl() and skip all the headache
with
copying.
However there is one problem: 32-bit 'struct ifreq' and 64-bit 'struct ifreq'
are not the same size. The former is 32 bytes and the latter is 40 bytes. Thus,
if you place a 32-bit 'struct ifreq' immediately before an unmapped page and
try to pass it to one of these ioctls, the syscall fails with EFAULT due to
this commit.
Steps to reproduce:
Copy attached file to /tmp/test.c, then:
[roc@...alhost-live ~]$ gcc -o /tmp/test /tmp/test.c && /tmp/test
Index: 1
[roc@...alhost-live ~]$ gcc -m32 -o /tmp/test /tmp/test.c && /tmp/test
Failed SIOCGIFINDEX: Bad address
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists