[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180423175417.4104464-5-yhs@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:54:11 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: <ast@...com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<ecree@...arflare.com>
CC: <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/10] bpf: remove never-hit branches in verifier adjust_scalar_min_max_vals
In verifier function adjust_scalar_min_max_vals,
when src_known is false and the opcode is BPF_LSH/BPF_RSH,
early return will happen in the function. So remove
the branch in handling BPF_LSH/BPF_RSH when src_known is false.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 ++---------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index d00bf53..1bbb43d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2932,10 +2932,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
dst_reg->umin_value <<= umin_val;
dst_reg->umax_value <<= umax_val;
}
- if (src_known)
- dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
- else
- dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(tnum_unknown, umin_val);
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_lshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
/* We may learn something more from the var_off */
__update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
break;
@@ -2963,11 +2960,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
*/
dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN;
dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX;
- if (src_known)
- dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(dst_reg->var_off,
- umin_val);
- else
- dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(tnum_unknown, umin_val);
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_rshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
dst_reg->umin_value >>= umax_val;
dst_reg->umax_value >>= umin_val;
/* We may learn something more from the var_off */
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists