[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a5f000a-5867-01f3-22a6-c4b12d4c3876@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 23:28:40 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@...com, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: disable and restore preemption in
__BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY
On 04/23/2018 07:09 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Running bpf programs requires disabled preemption,
> however at least some* of the BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY users
> do not follow this rule.
>
> To fix this bug, and also to make it not happen in the future,
> let's add explicit preemption disabling/re-enabling
> to the __BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY code.
>
> * for example:
> [ 17.624472] RIP: 0010:__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sk+0x1c4/0x1d0
> ...
> [ 17.640890] inet6_create+0x3eb/0x520
> [ 17.641405] __sock_create+0x242/0x340
> [ 17.641939] __sys_socket+0x57/0xe0
> [ 17.642370] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
> [ 17.642944] SyS_socket+0xa/0x10
> [ 17.643357] do_syscall_64+0x79/0x220
> [ 17.643879] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Applied to bpf, thanks Roman.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists