[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180424.095048.818224012961344954.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:50:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
vinicius.gomes@...el.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, anna-maria@...utronix.de,
henrik@...tad.us, john.stultz@...aro.org, levi.pearson@...man.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com, mlichvar@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 net-next 13/18] net/sched: Introduce the TBS Qdisc
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 10:50:04 +0200 (CEST)
> So adding 8 bytes to spare duplicated code will not change the kmem_cache
> object size and I really doubt that anyone will notice.
It's about where the cache lines end up when each and every byte is added
to the structure, not just the slab object size.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists