[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180424141601.GC26136@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 16:16:01 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/39] ipmi: simplify procfs code
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:29:29AM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 04/19/2018 07:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup instead
>> of a hand rolled list of proc entries, unwind the registration loop into
>> individual calls. Switch to use proc_create_single to further simplify
>> the code.
>
> I'm yanking all the proc code out of the IPMI driver in 3.18. So this is
> probably
> not necessary.
Ok, I'll drop this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists