[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0UerDqXbUcyspazUyzv=zqPWgsvdh9gEtjanre1pib216A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 15:22:54 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Daly, Dan" <dan.daly@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, netanel@...zon.com,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@...zon.de>,
"Wang, Liang-min" <liang-min.wang@...el.com>,
"Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, dwmw@...zon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [pci PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 05:22:27PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> > For example, I'm not sure what you mean by "devices where the PF is
>> > not capable of managing VF resources."
>> >
>> > It *sounds* like you're saying the hardware works differently on some
>> > devices, but I don't think that's what you mean. I think you're
>> > saying something about which drivers are used for the PF and the VF.
>>
>> That is sort of what I am saying.
>>
>> So for example with ixgbe there is functionality which is controlled
>> in the MMIO space of the PF that affects the functionality of the VFs
>> that are generated on the device. The PF has to rearrange the
>> resources such as queues and interrupts on the device before it can
>> enable SR-IOV, and it could alter those later to limit what the VF is
>> capable of doing.
>>
>> The model I am dealing with via this patch set has a PF that is not
>> much different than the VFs other than the fact that it has some
>> extended configuration space bits in place for SR-IOV, ARI, ACS, and
>> whatever other bits are needed in order to support spawning isolated
>> VFs.
>
> OK, thanks for the explanation, I think I understand what's going on
> now, correct me if I'm mistaken. I added a hint about "PF" for Randy,
> too.
>
> These are on pci/virtualization for v4.18.
I reviewed them and all of the changes to patches 1 & 2 both below,
and in the tree look good to me.
Thanks for taking care of all this.
- Alex
> commit 8effc395c209
> Author: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Date: Sat Apr 21 15:23:09 2018 -0500
>
> PCI/IOV: Add pci_sriov_configure_simple()
>
> SR-IOV (Single Root I/O Virtualization) is an optional PCIe capability (see
> PCIe r4.0, sec 9). A PCIe Function with the SR-IOV capability is referred
> to as a PF (Physical Function). If SR-IOV is enabled on the PF, several
> VFs (Virtual Functions) may be created. The VFs can be individually
> assigned to virtual machines, which allows them to share a single hardware
> device while being isolated from each other.
>
> Some SR-IOV devices have resources such as queues and interrupts that must
> be set up in the PF before enabling the VFs, so they require a PF driver to
> do that.
>
> Other SR-IOV devices don't require any PF setup before enabling VFs. Add a
> pci_sriov_configure_simple() interface so PF drivers for such devices can
> use it without repeating the VF-enabling code.
>
> Tested-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> [bhelgaas: changelog, comment]
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>:wq
>
> commit a8ccf8a66663
> Author: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Date: Tue Apr 24 16:47:16 2018 -0500
>
> PCI/IOV: Add pci-pf-stub driver for PFs that only enable VFs
>
> Some SR-IOV PF devices provide no functionality other than acting as a
> means of enabling VFs. For these devices, we want to enable the VFs and
> assign them to guest virtual machines, but there's no need to have a driver
> for the PF itself.
>
> Add a new pci-pf-stub driver to claim those PF devices and provide the
> generic VF enable functionality. An administrator can use the sysfs
> "sriov_numvfs" file to enable VFs, then assign them to guests.
>
> For now I only have one example ID provided by Amazon in terms of devices
> that require this functionality. The general idea is that in the future we
> will see other devices added as vendors come up with devices where the PF
> is more or less just a lightweight shim used to allocate VFs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> [bhelgaas: changelog]
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
> commit 115ddc491922
> Author: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Date: Tue Apr 24 16:47:22 2018 -0500
>
> net: ena: Use pci_sriov_configure_simple() to enable VFs
>
> Instead of implementing our own version of a SR-IOV configuration stub in
> the ena driver, use the existing pci_sriov_configure_simple() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
> commit 74d986abc20b
> Author: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Date: Tue Apr 24 16:47:27 2018 -0500
>
> nvme-pci: Use pci_sriov_configure_simple() to enable VFs
>
> Instead of implementing our own version of a SR-IOV configuration stub in
> the nvme driver, use the existing pci_sriov_configure_simple() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists