[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJieiUjbksYNYzBAAbtzW5PC6PbGoY15qHcDHDWLapsX6YiaPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:19:42 -0700
From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] fib rules extack support
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 7:21 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 09:41:29 -0700
>
>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> First patch refactors code to move fib rule netlink handling
>> into a common function. This became obvious when adding
>> duplicate extack msgs in add and del paths. Second patch
>> adds extack msgs.
>>
>> v2 - Dropped the ip route get support and selftests from
>> the series to look at the input path some more (as pointed
>> out by ido). Will come back to that next week when i have
>> some time. resending just the extack part for now.
>
> Series applied, but I was really looking forward to having those
> nice test cases in the tree.
yes, am on it. (and also excited about my first selftest!)
thanks (I just sent a follow-up bug fix for vrf).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists