[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180424082330.GD1440@alphalink.fr>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 10:23:30 +0200
From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jchapman@...alix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] l2tp: check sockaddr length in pppol2tp_connect()
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 09:11:22PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:15:14 +0200
>
> > Check sockaddr_len before dereferencing sp->sa_protocol, to ensure that
> > it actually points to valid data.
> >
> > Fixes: fd558d186df2 ("l2tp: Split pppol2tp patch into separate l2tp and ppp parts")
> > Reported-by: syzbot+a70ac890b23b1bf29f5c@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
>
> Applied and queued up for -stable.
>
> I guess you can completely remove the "bad socket address" -EINVAL else
> clause later in the function as a cleanup in net-next.
>
Yes, will do. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists