[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180425114526.GA17646@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:45:26 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix const parameter violation in
sctp_make_sack
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:17:34PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> sctp_make_sack() make changes to the asoc and this cast is just
> bypassing the const attribute. As there is no need to have the const
> there, just remove it and fix the violation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> ---
>
> This one can go to net or net-next, but targetting net-next here just to
> keep it together with the rest (which I'll post as patches get in).
>
> include/net/sctp/sm.h | 2 +-
> net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 9 ++++-----
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sm.h b/include/net/sctp/sm.h
> index 2d0e782c90551377ad654bcef1224bbdb75ba394..f4b657478a304050851f33d92c71162a4a4a2e50 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/sm.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/sm.h
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_datafrag_empty(const struct sctp_association *asoc,
> int len, __u8 flags, gfp_t gfp);
> struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_ecne(const struct sctp_association *asoc,
> const __u32 lowest_tsn);
> -struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_sack(const struct sctp_association *asoc);
> +struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_sack(struct sctp_association *asoc);
> struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_shutdown(const struct sctp_association *asoc,
> const struct sctp_chunk *chunk);
> struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_shutdown_ack(const struct sctp_association *asoc,
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> index 5a4fb1dc8400a0316177ce65be8126857297eb5e..db93eabd6ef500ab20be6e091ee06bd3b60923c9 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> @@ -779,10 +779,9 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_datafrag_empty(const struct sctp_association *asoc,
> * association. This reports on which TSN's we've seen to date,
> * including duplicates and gaps.
> */
> -struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_sack(const struct sctp_association *asoc)
> +struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_sack(struct sctp_association *asoc)
> {
> struct sctp_tsnmap *map = (struct sctp_tsnmap *)&asoc->peer.tsn_map;
> - struct sctp_association *aptr = (struct sctp_association *)asoc;
> struct sctp_gap_ack_block gabs[SCTP_MAX_GABS];
> __u16 num_gabs, num_dup_tsns;
> struct sctp_transport *trans;
> @@ -857,7 +856,7 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_sack(const struct sctp_association *asoc)
>
> /* Add the duplicate TSN information. */
> if (num_dup_tsns) {
> - aptr->stats.idupchunks += num_dup_tsns;
> + asoc->stats.idupchunks += num_dup_tsns;
> sctp_addto_chunk(retval, sizeof(__u32) * num_dup_tsns,
> sctp_tsnmap_get_dups(map));
> }
> @@ -869,11 +868,11 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_sack(const struct sctp_association *asoc)
> * association so no transport will match after a wrap event like this,
> * Until the next sack
> */
> - if (++aptr->peer.sack_generation == 0) {
> + if (++asoc->peer.sack_generation == 0) {
> list_for_each_entry(trans, &asoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> transports)
> trans->sack_generation = 0;
> - aptr->peer.sack_generation = 1;
> + asoc->peer.sack_generation = 1;
> }
> nodata:
> return retval;
> --
> 2.14.3
>
>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists