[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180425141435.bvolztivms25y2vt@ast-mbp>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:14:36 -0600
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Allow bpf_jit_enable = 2 with
 BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 05:25:47PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> 
> If we have concern for security issue, should we remove support for
> 'bpf_jit_enable = 2' and modify the doc to reflect this change?
I suggest to fix the doc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
