[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bc11ded-028f-6c8f-964e-a569b4e10813@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:51:32 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: cake@...ts.bufferbloat.net, Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] Add Common Applications Kept Enhanced (cake)
qdisc
On 04/25/2018 08:22 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> writes:
>> What performance number do you get on a 10Gbit NIC for example ?
>
> Single-flow throughput through 2 hops on a 40Gbit connection (with CAKE
> in unlimited mode vs pfifo_fast on the router):
>
> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to testbed-40g-2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo
> Recv Send Send
> Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> Size Size Size Time Throughput
> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>
> 87380 16384 16384 10.00 18840.40
>
> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to testbed-40g-2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo
> Recv Send Send
> Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> Size Size Size Time Throughput
> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>
> 87380 16384 16384 10.00 24804.77
CPU performance would be interesting here. (netperf -Cc)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists