[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8736zj6zj2.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:06:57 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: cake@...ts.bufferbloat.net, Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] Add Common Applications Kept Enhanced (cake) qdisc
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> writes:
> On 04/25/2018 08:22 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> writes:
>
>>> What performance number do you get on a 10Gbit NIC for example ?
>>
>> Single-flow throughput through 2 hops on a 40Gbit connection (with CAKE
>> in unlimited mode vs pfifo_fast on the router):
>>
>> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to testbed-40g-2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo
>> Recv Send Send
>> Socket Socket Message Elapsed
>> Size Size Size Time Throughput
>> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>>
>> 87380 16384 16384 10.00 18840.40
>>
>> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to testbed-40g-2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo
>> Recv Send Send
>> Socket Socket Message Elapsed
>> Size Size Size Time Throughput
>> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>>
>> 87380 16384 16384 10.00 24804.77
>
> CPU performance would be interesting here. (netperf -Cc)
$ sudo tc qdisc replace dev ens2 root cake
$ netperf -cC -H 10.70.2.2
MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.70.2.2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo
Recv Send Send Utilization Service Demand
Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send Recv
Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local remote
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/s % S % S us/KB us/KB
87380 16384 16384 10.00 15450.35 13.35 6.68 0.849 0.283
$ sudo tc qdisc del dev ens2 root
$ netperf -cC -H 10.70.2.2
MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.70.2.2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo
Recv Send Send Utilization Service Demand
Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send Recv
Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local remote
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/s % S % S us/KB us/KB
87380 16384 16384 10.00 36414.23 8.20 14.30 0.221 0.257
(In this test I'm running netperf on the machine that was a router
before, which is why the base throughput is higher; the other machine
runs out of CPU on the sender side).
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists