netdev - Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v5] fault-injection: introduce kvmalloc fallback options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:     Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
cc:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        dm-devel@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, mst@...hat.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        edumazet@...gle.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v5] fault-injection: introduce kvmalloc fallback
 options

On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Mikulas Patocka wrote:

> You need to enable it on boot. Enabling it when the kernel starts to 
> execute userspace code is already too late (because you would miss 
> kvmalloc calls in the kernel boot path).
> 

Is your motivation that since kvmalloc() never falls back to vmalloc() on 
boot because fragmentation is not be an issue at boot that we should catch 
bugs where it would matter if it had fallen back?  If we are worrying 
about falling back to vmalloc before even initscripts have run I think we 
have bigger problems.