[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36d099a9-0946-c7b6-3c1f-0f64fc6bdf19@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:56:21 +0800
From: Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, monis@...lanox.com,
jgg@...pe.ca, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] IB/rxe: avoid double kfree_skb
Hi, all
rxe_send [rdma_rxe]
ip_local_out
__ip_local_out
ip_output
ip_finish_output
ip_finish_output2
dev_queue_xmit
__dev_queue_xmit
dev_hard_start_xmit
e1000_xmit_frame [e1000]
When skb is sent, it will pass the above functions. I checked all the
above functions. If error occurs in the above functions after
ip_local_out, kfree_skb will be called.
So when ip_local_out returns an error, skb should be freed. It is not
necessary to call kfree_skb in soft roce module again.
If I am wrong, please correct me.
Zhu Yanjun
On 2018/4/24 16:34, Yanjun Zhu wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> rxe_send
> ip_local_out
> __ip_local_out
> nf_hook_slow
>
> In the above call process, nf_hook_slow drops and frees skb, then
> -EPERM is returned when iptables rules(iptables -I OUTPUT -p udp
> --dport 4791 -j DROP) is set.
>
> If skb->users is not changed in softroce, kfree_skb should not be
> called in this module.
>
> I will make further investigations about other error handler after
> ip_local_out.
> If I am wrong, please correct me.
>
> Any reply is appreciated.
>
> Zhu Yanjun
> On 2018/4/20 13:46, Yanjun Zhu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018/4/20 10:19, Doug Ledford wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 10:01 -0400, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>>> When skb is dropped by iptables rules, the skb is freed at the same
>>>> time
>>>> -EPERM is returned. So in softroce, it is not necessary to free skb
>>>> again.
>>>> Or else, crash will occur.
>>>>
>>>> The steps to reproduce:
>>>>
>>>> server client
>>>> --------- ---------
>>>> |1.1.1.1|<----rxe-channel--->|1.1.1.2|
>>>> --------- ---------
>>>>
>>>> On server: rping -s -a 1.1.1.1 -v -C 10000 -S 512
>>>> On client: rping -c -a 1.1.1.1 -v -C 10000 -S 512
>>>>
>>>> The kernel configs CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK and
>>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS are enabled on both server and client.
>>>>
>>>> When rping runs, run the following command in server:
>>>>
>>>> iptables -I OUTPUT -p udp --dport 4791 -j DROP
>>>>
>>>> Without this patch, crash will occur.
>>>>
>>>> CC: Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@...cle.com>
>>>> CC: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>
>>> I have no reason to doubt your analysis, but if there are a bunch of
>>> error paths for net_xmit and they all return with your skb still being
>>> valid and holding a reference, and then one oddball that returns with
>>> your skb already gone, that just sounds like a mistake waiting to
>>> happen
>>> (not to mention a bajillion special cases sprinkled everywhere to deal
>>> with this apparent inconsistency).
>>>
>>> Can we get a netdev@ confirmation on this being the right solution?
>> Yes. I agree with you.
>> After iptables rule "iptables -I OUTPUT -p udp --dport 4791 -j
>> DROP", the skb is freed in this function
>>
>> /* Returns 1 if okfn() needs to be executed by the caller,
>> * -EPERM for NF_DROP, 0 otherwise. Caller must hold rcu_read_lock. */
>> int nf_hook_slow(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_hook_state *state,
>> const struct nf_hook_entries *e, unsigned int s)
>> {
>> unsigned int verdict;
>> int ret;
>>
>> for (; s < e->num_hook_entries; s++) {
>> verdict = nf_hook_entry_hookfn(&e->hooks[s], skb,
>> state);
>> switch (verdict & NF_VERDICT_MASK) {
>> case NF_ACCEPT:
>> break;
>> case NF_DROP:
>> kfree_skb(skb); <----here, skb is freed
>> ret = NF_DROP_GETERR(verdict);
>> if (ret == 0)
>> ret = -EPERM;
>> return ret;
>> case NF_QUEUE:
>> ret = nf_queue(skb, state, e, s, verdict);
>> if (ret == 1)
>> continue;
>> return ret;
>> default:
>> /* Implicit handling for NF_STOLEN, as well
>> as any other
>> * non conventional verdicts.
>> */
>> return 0;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> return 1;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_hook_slow);
>>
>> If I am wrong, please correct me.
>>
>> And my test environment is still there, any solution can be verified
>> in it.
>>
>> Zhu Yanjun
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c | 3 +++
>>>> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c | 5 +++--
>>>> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c | 9 ++++++---
>>>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
>>>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
>>>> index 9da6e37..2094434 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
>>>> @@ -511,6 +511,9 @@ int rxe_send(struct rxe_pkt_info *pkt, struct
>>>> sk_buff *skb)
>>>> if (unlikely(net_xmit_eval(err))) {
>>>> pr_debug("error sending packet: %d\n", err);
>>>> + /* -EPERM means the skb is dropped and freed. */
>>>> + if (err == -EPERM)
>>>> + return -EPERM;
>>>> return -EAGAIN;
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
>>>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
>>>> index 7bdaf71..9d2efec 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
>>>> @@ -727,8 +727,9 @@ int rxe_requester(void *arg)
>>>> rollback_state(wqe, qp, &rollback_wqe,
>>>> rollback_psn);
>>>> - if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
>>>> - kfree_skb(skb);
>>>> + if ((ret == -EAGAIN) || (ret == -EPERM)) {
>>>> + if (ret == -EAGAIN)
>>>> + kfree_skb(skb);
>>>> rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, 1);
>>>> goto exit;
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
>>>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
>>>> index a65c996..6bdf9b2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
>>>> @@ -742,7 +742,8 @@ static enum resp_states read_reply(struct
>>>> rxe_qp *qp,
>>>> err = rxe_xmit_packet(rxe, qp, &ack_pkt, skb);
>>>> if (err) {
>>>> pr_err("Failed sending RDMA reply.\n");
>>>> - kfree_skb(skb);
>>>> + if (err != -EPERM)
>>>> + kfree_skb(skb);
>>>> return RESPST_ERR_RNR;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -956,7 +957,8 @@ static int send_ack(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct
>>>> rxe_pkt_info *pkt,
>>>> err = rxe_xmit_packet(rxe, qp, &ack_pkt, skb);
>>>> if (err) {
>>>> pr_err_ratelimited("Failed sending ack\n");
>>>> - kfree_skb(skb);
>>>> + if (err != -EPERM)
>>>> + kfree_skb(skb);
>>>> }
>>>> err1:
>>>> @@ -1141,7 +1143,8 @@ static enum resp_states
>>>> duplicate_request(struct rxe_qp *qp,
>>>> if (rc) {
>>>> pr_err("Failed resending result.
>>>> This flow is not handled - skb ignored\n");
>>>> rxe_drop_ref(qp);
>>>> - kfree_skb(skb_copy);
>>>> + if (rc != -EPERM)
>>>> + kfree_skb(skb_copy);
>>>> rc = RESPST_CLEANUP;
>>>> goto out;
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.4
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists