[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1524743477.2658.38.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:51:17 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Ashwanth Goli <ashwanth@...eaurora.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, maloney@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: ip6-in-ip{4,6} ipsec tunnel issues with 1280 MTU
Hi,
[fixed CC list]
On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 21:43 +0530, Ashwanth Goli wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
Actually I'm Paolo, but yours is a recurring mistake ;)
> I am noticing an issue similar to the one reported by Alexis Perez
> [Regression for ip6-in-ip4 IPsec tunnel in 4.14.16]
>
> In my IPsec setup outer MTU is set to 1280, ip6_setup_cork sees an MTU
> less than IPV6_MIN_MTU because of the tunnel headers. -EINVAL is being
> returned as a result of the MTU check that got added with below patch.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c?h=v4.14.34&id=8278804e05f6bcfe3fdfea4a404020752ead15a6
>
> Can we remove this MTU check since your recent patch [ipv6: the entire
> IPv6 header chain must fit the first fragment] fixes a similar issue?
AFAICS, RFC 2473 implies we can have MTU below 1280 for tunnel devices
so we can probably relax the MTU check for such devices, but I think we
would still need it in the general case.
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists