[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd077af6-89dd-7e24-842f-629de4f145b3@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:00:08 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+de73361ee4971b6e6f75@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: check iface upper dev when setting master via
ioctl
On 26/04/18 16:56, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> When we set a bond slave's master to bridge via ioctl, we only check
> the IFF_BRIDGE_PORT flag. Although we will find the slave's real master
> at netdev_master_upper_dev_link() later, it already does some settings
> and allocates some resources. So it would be better to return as early
> as possible.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+de73361ee4971b6e6f75@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_if.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> index 82c1a6f..176de8a9 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> @@ -518,8 +518,8 @@ int br_add_if(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_device *dev,
> return -ELOOP;
> }
>
> - /* Device is already being bridged */
> - if (br_port_exists(dev))
> + /* Device has master upper dev */
> + if (netdev_has_any_upper_dev(dev))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> /* No bridging devices that dislike that (e.g. wireless) */
>
Not all upper devs are masters. This can break some setups.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists