netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] tcp: mmap: rework zerocopy receive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrVBQD1tPUzc_t7HmoPfApTdFW+x-0DqL8+XHjrmEpYMXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:16:55 +0000
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] tcp: mmap: rework zerocopy receive

At the risk of further muddying the waters, there's another minor tweak
that could improve performance on certain workloads.  Currently you mmap()
a range for a given socket and then getsockopt() to receive.  If you made
it so you could mmap() something once for any number of sockets (by
mmapping /dev/misc/tcp_zero_receive or whatever), then the performance of
the getsockopt() bit would be identical, but you could release the mapping
for many sockets at once with only a single flush.  For some use cases,
this could be a big win.

You could also add this later easily enough, too.