[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <99a803c0a1a5887e56c756e60bb7a30acd2fe196.1524784510.git.petrm@mellanox.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 01:19:15 +0200
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-mlxsw@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/7] selftests: forwarding: Test gretap mirror with
next-hop remote
Test mirror to a gretap and an ip6gretap netdevice such that the remote
address of the tunnel is reachable through a next-hop route.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
.../selftests/net/forwarding/mirror_gre_nh.sh | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 117 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/mirror_gre_nh.sh
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/mirror_gre_nh.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/mirror_gre_nh.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..9ac7097
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/mirror_gre_nh.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+# This test uses standard topology for testing gretap. See
+# mirror_gre_topo_lib.sh for more details.
+#
+# Test that gretap and ip6gretap mirroring works when the other tunnel endpoint
+# is reachable through a next-hop route (as opposed to directly-attached route).
+
+NUM_NETIFS=6
+source lib.sh
+source mirror_lib.sh
+source mirror_gre_lib.sh
+source mirror_gre_topo_lib.sh
+
+setup_prepare()
+{
+ h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
+ swp1=${NETIFS[p2]}
+
+ swp2=${NETIFS[p3]}
+ h2=${NETIFS[p4]}
+
+ swp3=${NETIFS[p5]}
+ h3=${NETIFS[p6]}
+
+ vrf_prepare
+ mirror_gre_topo_create
+
+ ip address add dev $swp3 192.0.2.161/28
+ ip address add dev $h3 192.0.2.162/28
+ ip address add dev gt4 192.0.2.129/32
+ ip address add dev h3-gt4 192.0.2.130/32
+
+ # IPv6 route can't be added after address. Such routes are rejected due
+ # to the gateway address having been configured on the local system. It
+ # works the other way around though.
+ ip address add dev $swp3 2001:db8:4::1/64
+ ip -6 route add 2001:db8:2::2/128 via 2001:db8:4::2
+ ip address add dev $h3 2001:db8:4::2/64
+ ip address add dev gt6 2001:db8:2::1
+ ip address add dev h3-gt6 2001:db8:2::2
+}
+
+cleanup()
+{
+ pre_cleanup
+
+ ip -6 route del 2001:db8:2::2/128 via 2001:db8:4::2
+ ip address del dev $h3 2001:db8:4::2/64
+ ip address del dev $swp3 2001:db8:4::1/64
+
+ ip address del dev $h3 192.0.2.162/28
+ ip address del dev $swp3 192.0.2.161/28
+
+ mirror_gre_topo_destroy
+ vrf_cleanup
+}
+
+test_gretap()
+{
+ RET=0
+ mirror_install $swp1 ingress gt4 "matchall $tcflags"
+
+ # For IPv4, test that there's no mirroring without the route directing
+ # the traffic to tunnel remote address. Then add it and test that
+ # mirroring starts. For IPv6 we can't test this due to the limitation
+ # that routes for locally-specified IPv6 addresses can't be added.
+ fail_test_span_gre_dir gt4 ingress
+
+ ip route add 192.0.2.130/32 via 192.0.2.162
+ quick_test_span_gre_dir gt4 ingress
+ ip route del 192.0.2.130/32 via 192.0.2.162
+
+ mirror_uninstall $swp1 ingress
+ log_test "mirror to gre with next-hop remote ($tcflags)"
+}
+
+test_ip6gretap()
+{
+ RET=0
+
+ mirror_install $swp1 ingress gt6 "matchall $tcflags"
+ quick_test_span_gre_dir gt6 ingress
+ mirror_uninstall $swp1 ingress
+
+ log_test "mirror to ip6gre with next-hop remote ($tcflags)"
+}
+
+test_all()
+{
+ slow_path_trap_install $swp1 ingress
+ slow_path_trap_install $swp1 egress
+
+ test_gretap
+ test_ip6gretap
+
+ slow_path_trap_uninstall $swp1 egress
+ slow_path_trap_uninstall $swp1 ingress
+}
+
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
+setup_prepare
+setup_wait
+
+tcflags="skip_hw"
+test_all
+
+if ! tc_offload_check; then
+ echo "WARN: Could not test offloaded functionality"
+else
+ tcflags="skip_sw"
+ test_all
+fi
+
+exit $EXIT_STATUS
--
2.4.11
Powered by blists - more mailing lists