[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180426155619.2c5d87d1@xhacker.debian>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 15:56:19 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To: Bhadram Varka <vbhadram@...dia.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jingju Hou <Jingju.Hou@...aptics.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: marvell: clear wol event before setting it
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:56:33 +0530 Bhadram Varka wrote:
> Hi,
> On 4/26/2018 11:45 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:10:21 +0530 Bhadram Varka wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 4/19/2018 5:48 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:02:32PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
<snip>
> >>>> if (err < 0)
> >>>> goto error;
> >>>>
> >>>> + /* If WOL event happened once, the LED[2] interrupt pin
> >>>> + * will not be cleared unless reading the CSISR register.
> >>>> + * So clear the WOL event first before enabling it.
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + phy_read(phydev, MII_88E1318S_PHY_CSISR);
> >>>> +
> >>> Hi Jisheng
> >>>
> >>> The problem with this is, you could be clearing a real interrupt, link
> >>> down/up etc. If interrupts are in use, i think the normal interrupt
> >>> handling will clear the WOL interrupt? So can you make this read
> >>> conditional on !phy_interrupt_is_valid()?
> >> So this will clear WoL interrupt bit from Copper Interrupt status register.
> >>
> >> How about clearing WoL status (Page 17, register 17) for every WOL event ?
> >>
> > This is already properly done by setting MII_88E1318S_PHY_WOL_CTRL_CLEAR_WOL_STATUS
> > in m88e1318_set_wol()
> This part of the code executes only when we enable WOL through ethtool
> (ethtool -s eth0 wol g)
>
> Lets say once WOL enabled through magic packet - HW generates WOL
> interrupt once magic packet received.
> The problem that I see here is that for the next immediate magic packet
> I don't see WOL interrupt generated by the HW.
hmm, so you want a "stick" WOL feature, I dunno whether Linux kernel
requires WOL should be "stick".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists