[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180427171803.4zq3ts4owhhau6ds@kafai-mbp>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:18:05 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: btf: silence uninitialize variable warnings
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:04:09PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that size can be uninitialized if btf_type_id_size()
> returns NULL. It seems reasonable enough to check for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> This goes to the BPF tree (linux-next).
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 22e1046a1a86..e631b6fd60d3 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -1229,7 +1229,8 @@ static int btf_array_check_member(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
> }
>
> array_type_id = member->type;
> - btf_type_id_size(btf, &array_type_id, &array_size);
> + if (!btf_type_id_size(btf, &array_type_id, &array_size))
> + return -EINVAL;
This check is not needed. It does not happen for array.
> struct_size = struct_type->size;
> bytes_offset = BITS_ROUNDDOWN_BYTES(struct_bits_off);
> if (struct_size - bytes_offset < array_size) {
> @@ -1351,6 +1352,8 @@ static void btf_array_seq_show(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
>
> elem_type_id = array->type;
> elem_type = btf_type_id_size(btf, &elem_type_id, &elem_size);
> + if (!elem_type)
> + return;
This case has already been checked in verification phase. No need
to recheck everything again..
> elem_ops = btf_type_ops(elem_type);
> seq_puts(m, "[");
> for (i = 0; i < array->nelems; i++) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists