[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180427152317.11ef32fb@xhacker.debian>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:23:17 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To: Bhadram Varka <vbhadram@...dia.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jingju Hou <Jingju.Hou@...aptics.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: marvell: clear wol event before setting it
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:22:34 +0530 Bhadram Varka wrote:
> Hi Andrew/Jisheng,
>
> On 4/26/2018 6:10 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> hmm, so you want a "stick" WOL feature, I dunno whether Linux kernel
> >> requires WOL should be "stick".
> > I see two different cases:
> >
> > Suspend/resume: The WoL state in the kernel is probably kept across
> > such a cycle. If so, you would expect another suspend/resume to also
> > work, without needs to reconfigure it.
> Trying this scenario (suspend/resume) from my side. In this case WoL
> should be enabled in the HW. For Marvell PHY to generate WoL interrupt
> we need to clear WoL status.
> Above mentioned change required to make this happen. Please share your
> thoughts on this.
I'm fine with that patch. Maybe you could send out a patch?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists