netdev - [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: relax constraints on formatting for eBPF helper documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180430155938.1387-1-quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Apr 2018 16:59:38 +0100
From:   Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
To:     daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org
Cc:     dsahern@...il.com, yhs@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com, quentin.monnet@...ronome.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: relax constraints on formatting for eBPF helper documentation

The Python script used to parse and extract eBPF helpers documentation
from include/uapi/linux/bpf.h expects a very specific formatting for the
descriptions (single dots represent a space, '>' stands for a tab):

    /*
     ...
     *.int bpf_helper(list of arguments)
     *.>    Description
     *.>    >       Start of description
     *.>    >       Another line of description
     *.>    >       And yet another line of description
     *.>    Return
     *.>    >       0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure
     ...
     */

This is too strict, and painful for developers who wants to add
documentation for new helpers. Worse, it is extremelly difficult to
check that the formatting is correct during reviews. Change the
format expected by the script and make it more flexible. The script now
works whether or not the initial space (right after the star) is
present, and accepts both tabs and white spaces (or a combination of
both) for indenting description sections and contents.

Concretely, something like the following would now be supported:

    /*
     ...
     *int bpf_helper(list of arguments)
     *......Description
     *.>    >       Start of description...
     *>     >       Another line of description
     *..............And yet another line of description
     *>     Return
     *.>    ........0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure
     ...
     */

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
---
 scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py b/scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py
index 30ba0fee36e4..717547e6f0a6 100755
--- a/scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py
+++ b/scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
         #   - Same as above, with "const" and/or "struct" in front of type
         #   - "..." (undefined number of arguments, for bpf_trace_printk())
         # There is at least one term ("void"), and at most five arguments.
-        p = re.compile('^ \* ((.+) \**\w+\((((const )?(struct )?(\w+|\.\.\.)( \**\w+)?)(, )?){1,5}\))$')
+        p = re.compile('^ \* ?((.+) \**\w+\((((const )?(struct )?(\w+|\.\.\.)( \**\w+)?)(, )?){1,5}\))$')
         capture = p.match(self.line)
         if not capture:
             raise NoHelperFound
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
         return capture.group(1)
 
     def parse_desc(self):
-        p = re.compile('^ \* \tDescription$')
+        p = re.compile('^ \* ?(?:\t| {6,8})Description$')
         capture = p.match(self.line)
         if not capture:
             # Helper can have empty description and we might be parsing another
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
             if self.line == ' *\n':
                 desc += '\n'
             else:
-                p = re.compile('^ \* \t\t(.*)')
+                p = re.compile('^ \* ?(?:\t| {6,8})(?:\t| {8})(.*)')
                 capture = p.match(self.line)
                 if capture:
                     desc += capture.group(1) + '\n'
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
         return desc
 
     def parse_ret(self):
-        p = re.compile('^ \* \tReturn$')
+        p = re.compile('^ \* ?(?:\t| {6,8})Return$')
         capture = p.match(self.line)
         if not capture:
             # Helper can have empty retval and we might be parsing another
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ class HeaderParser(object):
             if self.line == ' *\n':
                 ret += '\n'
             else:
-                p = re.compile('^ \* \t\t(.*)')
+                p = re.compile('^ \* ?(?:\t| {6,8})(?:\t| {8})(.*)')
                 capture = p.match(self.line)
                 if capture:
                     ret += capture.group(1) + '\n'
-- 
2.14.1