[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180430.124419.1474600899491240220.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:44:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: idosch@...lanox.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
jiri@...lanox.com, petrm@...lanox.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] mlxsw: SPAN: Support routes pointing
at bridges
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 10:56:07 +0300
> Petr says:
>
> When mirroring to a gretap or ip6gretap netdevice, the route that
> directs the encapsulated packets can reference a bridge. In that case,
> in the software model, the packet is switched.
>
> Thus when offloading mirroring like that, take into consideration FDB,
> STP, PVID configured at the bridge, and whether that VLAN ID should be
> tagged on egress.
>
> Patch #1 introduces functions to get bridge PVID, VLAN flags and to look
> up an FDB entry.
>
> Patches #2 and #3 refactor some existing code and introduce a new
> accessor function.
>
> With patches #4 and #5 mlxsw calls mlxsw_sp_span_respin() on switchdev
> events as well. There is no impact yet, because bridge as an underlay
> device is still not allowed.
>
> That is implemented in patch #6, which uses the new interfaces to figure
> out on which one port the mirroring should be configured, and whether
> the mirrored packets should be VLAN-tagged and how.
>
> Changes from v2 to v3:
>
> - Rename the suite of bridge accessor function to br_vlan_get_pvid(),
> br_vlan_get_info() and br_fdb_find_port(). The _get bit is to avoid
> clashing with an existing static function.
>
> Changes from v1 to v2:
>
> - Change the suite of bridge accessor functions to br_vlan_pvid_rtnl(),
> br_vlan_info_rtnl(), br_fdb_find_port_rtnl().
Series applied, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists