[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180430232448.GB25602@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 01:24:48 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rmk@...linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cphealy@...il.com, nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, Nisar.Sayed@...rochip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/5] Support for PHY test modes
> Turning these tests on will typically result in the link partner
> dropping the link with us, and the interface will be non-functional as
> far as the data path is concerned (similar to an isolation mode). This
> might warrant properly reporting that to user-space through e.g: a
> private IFF_* value maybe?
Hi Florian
I think a IFF_* value would be a good idea. We want to give the user
some indicate why they don't have working networking. ip link show
showing PHY-TEST-MODE would help.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists