lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:59:10 -0600 From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> To: Thomas Winter <Thomas.Winter@...iedtelesis.co.nz>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: Allow non-gateway ECMP for IPv6 On 4/30/18 3:15 PM, Thomas Winter wrote: > It is valid to have static routes where the nexthop > is an interface not an address such as tunnels. > For IPv4 it was possible to use ECMP on these routes > but not for IPv6. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Winter <Thomas.Winter@...iedtelesis.co.nz> > Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> > Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru> > Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org> > --- > include/net/ip6_route.h | 3 +-- > net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 3 --- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > Interesting. Existing code inserts the dev nexthop as a separate route. Change looks good to me. Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists