[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180502174737.17875.74031.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 10:47:37 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: borkmann@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [bpf PATCH 3/3] bpf: sockmap,
fix error handling in redirect failures
When a redirect failure happens we release the buffers in-flight
without calling a sk_mem_uncharge(), the uncharge is called before
dropping the sock lock for the redirecte, however we missed updating
the ring start index. When no apply actions are in progress this
is OK because we uncharge the entire buffer before the redirect.
But, when we have apply logic running its possible that only a
portion of the buffer is being redirected. In this case we only
do memory accounting for the buffer slice being redirected and
expect to be able to loop over the BPF program again and/or if
a sock is closed uncharge the memory at sock destruct time.
With an invalid start index however the program logic looks at
the start pointer index, checks the length, and when seeing the
length is zero (from the initial release and failure to update
the pointer) aborts without uncharging/releasing the remaining
memory.
The fix for this is simply to update the start index. To avoid
fixing this error in two locations we do a small refactor and
remove one case where it is open-coded. Then fix it in the
single function.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
---
kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 26 +++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
index 052c313..7e3c4cd 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
@@ -393,7 +393,8 @@ static void return_mem_sg(struct sock *sk, int bytes, struct sk_msg_buff *md)
} while (i != md->sg_end);
}
-static void free_bytes_sg(struct sock *sk, int bytes, struct sk_msg_buff *md)
+static void free_bytes_sg(struct sock *sk, int bytes,
+ struct sk_msg_buff *md, bool charge)
{
struct scatterlist *sg = md->sg_data;
int i = md->sg_start, free;
@@ -403,11 +404,13 @@ static void free_bytes_sg(struct sock *sk, int bytes, struct sk_msg_buff *md)
if (bytes < free) {
sg[i].length -= bytes;
sg[i].offset += bytes;
- sk_mem_uncharge(sk, bytes);
+ if (charge)
+ sk_mem_uncharge(sk, bytes);
break;
}
- sk_mem_uncharge(sk, sg[i].length);
+ if (charge)
+ sk_mem_uncharge(sk, sg[i].length);
put_page(sg_page(&sg[i]));
bytes -= sg[i].length;
sg[i].length = 0;
@@ -418,6 +421,7 @@ static void free_bytes_sg(struct sock *sk, int bytes, struct sk_msg_buff *md)
if (i == MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
i = 0;
}
+ md->sg_start = i;
}
static int free_sg(struct sock *sk, int start, struct sk_msg_buff *md)
@@ -578,7 +582,7 @@ static int bpf_tcp_sendmsg_do_redirect(struct sock *sk, int send,
{
struct smap_psock *psock;
struct scatterlist *sg;
- int i, err, free = 0;
+ int i, err = 0;
bool ingress = !!(md->flags & BPF_F_INGRESS);
sg = md->sg_data;
@@ -607,16 +611,8 @@ static int bpf_tcp_sendmsg_do_redirect(struct sock *sk, int send,
out_rcu:
rcu_read_unlock();
out:
- i = md->sg_start;
- while (sg[i].length) {
- free += sg[i].length;
- put_page(sg_page(&sg[i]));
- sg[i].length = 0;
- i++;
- if (i == MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
- i = 0;
- }
- return free;
+ free_bytes_sg(NULL, send, md, false);
+ return err;
}
static inline void bpf_md_init(struct smap_psock *psock)
@@ -720,7 +716,7 @@ static int bpf_exec_tx_verdict(struct smap_psock *psock,
break;
case __SK_DROP:
default:
- free_bytes_sg(sk, send, m);
+ free_bytes_sg(sk, send, m, true);
apply_bytes_dec(psock, send);
*copied -= send;
psock->sg_size -= send;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists