[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180502.145351.1788075051189752807.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 14:53:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: ast@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf, x64: fix memleak when not converging
after image
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 20:12:22 +0200
> While reviewing x64 JIT code, I noticed that we leak the prior allocated
> JIT image in the case where proglen != oldproglen during the JIT passes.
> Prior to the commit e0ee9c12157d ("x86: bpf_jit: fix two bugs in eBPF JIT
> compiler") we would just break out of the loop, and using the image as the
> JITed prog since it could only shrink in size anyway. After e0ee9c12157d,
> we would bail out to out_addrs label where we free addrs and jit_data but
> not the image coming from bpf_jit_binary_alloc().
>
> Fixes: e0ee9c12157d ("x86: bpf_jit: fix two bugs in eBPF JIT compiler")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists