[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de0af198-d1fd-e1fb-2677-3089fa6500a9@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 22:55:52 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sh_eth: WARN_ON() access to unimplemented TSU register
Commit 3365711df024 ("sh_eth: WARN on access to a register not implemented
in a particular chip") added WARN_ON() to sh_eth_{read|write}() but not
to sh_eth_tsu_{read|write}(). Now that we've routed almost all TSU register
accesses (except TSU_ADR{H|L}<n> -- which are special) thru the latter
pair of accessors, it makes sense to check for the unimplemented TSU
registers as well...
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: net-next/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
===================================================================
--- net-next.orig/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
+++ net-next/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
@@ -442,12 +442,22 @@ static void sh_eth_modify(struct net_dev
static void sh_eth_tsu_write(struct sh_eth_private *mdp, u32 data,
int enum_index)
{
- iowrite32(data, mdp->tsu_addr + mdp->reg_offset[enum_index]);
+ u16 offset = mdp->reg_offset[enum_index];
+
+ if (WARN_ON(offset == SH_ETH_OFFSET_INVALID))
+ return;
+
+ iowrite32(data, mdp->tsu_addr + offset);
}
static u32 sh_eth_tsu_read(struct sh_eth_private *mdp, int enum_index)
{
- return ioread32(mdp->tsu_addr + mdp->reg_offset[enum_index]);
+ u16 offset = mdp->reg_offset[enum_index];
+
+ if (WARN_ON(offset == SH_ETH_OFFSET_INVALID))
+ return ~0U;
+
+ return ioread32(mdp->tsu_addr + offset);
}
static void sh_eth_select_mii(struct net_device *ndev)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists