netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/15] ARM: sun8i: r40: Add Ethernet support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180503131257.rlqxetafejikmnji@flea>
Date:   Thu, 3 May 2018 15:12:57 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     wens@...e.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        peppe.cavallaro@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        broonie@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, clabbe.montjoie@...il.com, icenowy@...c.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/15] ARM: sun8i: r40: Add Ethernet support

Hi Dave,

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:06:17AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 00:33:45 +0800
> 
> > I should've mentioned that patches 3 ~ 10, and only these, should go
> > through net-next. sunxi will handle the remaining clk, device tree, and
> > soc driver patches.
> 
> Ok, I just noticed this.
> 
> Why don't you just post those patches separately as a series on their
> own then, in order to avoid confusion?
> 
> Then you can adjust the patch series header posting to explain the
> non-net-next changes, where they got merged, and what they provide
> in order to faciliate the net-next changes.

I now that we usually have some feedback from non-net maintainers that
they actually prefer seeing the full picture (and I also tend to
prefer that as well) and having all the patches relevant to enable a
particular feature, even if it means getting multiple maintainers
involved.

Just to make sure we understood you fully, do you want Chen-Yu to
resend his serie following your comments, or was that just a general
remark for next time?

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)