netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ixgbe: release lock for the duration of ixgbe_suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGM2reZULTOcK+_VypXJjkkCNZbALuR_FS-t7ix-Wpq6AKXdjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 03 May 2018 14:23:09 +0000
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To:     Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>
Cc:     alexander.duyck@...il.com,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ixgbe: release lock for the duration of ixgbe_suspend_close()

> Hi Pavel, you might want to pull lock optimization out of this patch
series.
> The parallelization by itself is valuable, and optimizations for
individual
> devices including locks can come later.

Hi Steve,

Yes, I will pull this patch out of the series. Thank you for the suggestion.

Pavel