lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 3 May 2018 23:56:59 +0300
From:   Ran Shalit <ranshalit@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DSA switch

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:35:08PM +0300, Ran Shalit wrote:
>> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:20:05PM +0300, Ran Shalit wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> Is it possible to use switch just like external real switch,
>> >> connecting all ports to the same subnet ?
>> >
>> > Yes. Just bridge all ports/interfaces together and put your host IP
>> > address on the bridge.
>>
>> I also noticed that even before making the bridge connection between
>> all "lanX" interfaces, the ports already communicates with each other
>
> That should not happen. They should be isolated.
>
> What kernel version are you using?
>

I am using kernel 2.6.37, but I think it is not kernel issue, but more
bad patches done on kernel.
It is based on TI's kernel, but with some custom modifications on
driver's switch, to make it work with TI's cpsw switch.
Seems like someone made some bad patch, I'll continue investigating it.
You can ignore the question...

Many thanks a lot for the help,
Ran

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ