[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180504175144.12179-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 19:51:43 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@....samsung.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] lockdep: Add a assert_in_softirq()
From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Instead of directly warn on wrong context, check if softirq context is
set. This check could be a nop on RT.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
include/linux/lockdep.h | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 6fc77d4dbdcd..59363c3047c6 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -608,11 +608,17 @@ do { \
"IRQs not disabled as expected\n"); \
} while (0)
+#define lockdep_assert_in_softirq() do { \
+ WARN_ONCE(debug_locks && !current->lockdep_recursion && \
+ !current->softirq_context, \
+ "Not in softirq context as expected\n"); \
+ } while (0)
#else
# define might_lock(lock) do { } while (0)
# define might_lock_read(lock) do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled() do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled() do { } while (0)
+# define lockdep_assert_in_softirq() do { } while (0)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists