[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d51c9746-d3e9-48f5-fc93-b63e4c5c7a8c@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 16:13:07 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
swise@...ngridcomputing.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] rdma: fix header files
On 5/4/18 3:56 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> All user api headers in iproute2 should be in include/uapi
> so that script can be used to put correct sanitized kernel headers
> there. And the header files for rdma must be a complete set; if one
> header file includes another, all must be present.
>
> This fixes build on older distributions, and Windows Services
> for Linux.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> ---
> include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_sa.h | 77 ++
> include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h | 1210 +++++++++++++++++
> .../uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h | 13 +
> .../uapi/rdma/rdma_user_cm.h | 6 +-
> 4 files changed, 1303 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_sa.h
> create mode 100644 include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h
> rename {rdma/include => include}/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h (95%)
> rename {rdma/include => include}/uapi/rdma/rdma_user_cm.h (98%)
>
Stephen:
Per a recent discussion the RDMA folks need to take ownership of the
uapi files. RDMA features do not hit Dave's net-next tree so the rdma
code can never hit iproute2-next during a dev cycle.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists