[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180504223337.GO5105@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 19:33:37 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: delay the authentication for the duplicated
cookie-echo chunk
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 05:05:10PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> Now sctp only delays the authentication for the normal cookie-echo
> chunk by setting chunk->auth_chunk in sctp_endpoint_bh_rcv(). But
> for the duplicated one with auth, in sctp_assoc_bh_rcv(), it does
> authentication first based on the old asoc, which will definitely
> fail due to the different auth info in the old asoc.
>
> The duplicated cookie-echo chunk will create a new asoc with the
> auth info from this chunk, and the authentication should also be
> done with the new asoc's auth info for all of the collision 'A',
> 'B' and 'D'. Otherwise, the duplicated cookie-echo chunk with auth
> will never pass the authentication and create the new connection.
>
> This issue exists since very beginning, and this fix is to make
> sctp_assoc_bh_rcv() follow the way sctp_assoc_bh_rcv() does for
I guess you meant sctp_endpoint_bh_rcv here --^ right?
Other than this LGTM
> the normal cookie-echo chunk to delay the authentication.
>
> While at it, remove the unused params from sctp_sf_authenticate()
> and define sctp_auth_chunk_verify() used for all the places that
> do the delayed authentication.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/associola.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++-
> net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
> index 837806d..a47179d 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
> @@ -1024,8 +1024,9 @@ static void sctp_assoc_bh_rcv(struct work_struct *work)
> struct sctp_endpoint *ep;
> struct sctp_chunk *chunk;
> struct sctp_inq *inqueue;
> - int state;
> + int first_time = 1; /* is this the first time through the loop */
> int error = 0;
> + int state;
>
> /* The association should be held so we should be safe. */
> ep = asoc->ep;
> @@ -1036,6 +1037,30 @@ static void sctp_assoc_bh_rcv(struct work_struct *work)
> state = asoc->state;
> subtype = SCTP_ST_CHUNK(chunk->chunk_hdr->type);
>
> + /* If the first chunk in the packet is AUTH, do special
> + * processing specified in Section 6.3 of SCTP-AUTH spec
> + */
> + if (first_time && subtype.chunk == SCTP_CID_AUTH) {
> + struct sctp_chunkhdr *next_hdr;
> +
> + next_hdr = sctp_inq_peek(inqueue);
> + if (!next_hdr)
> + goto normal;
> +
> + /* If the next chunk is COOKIE-ECHO, skip the AUTH
> + * chunk while saving a pointer to it so we can do
> + * Authentication later (during cookie-echo
> + * processing).
> + */
> + if (next_hdr->type == SCTP_CID_COOKIE_ECHO) {
> + chunk->auth_chunk = skb_clone(chunk->skb,
> + GFP_ATOMIC);
> + chunk->auth = 1;
> + continue;
> + }
> + }
> +
> +normal:
> /* SCTP-AUTH, Section 6.3:
> * The receiver has a list of chunk types which it expects
> * to be received only after an AUTH-chunk. This list has
> @@ -1074,6 +1099,9 @@ static void sctp_assoc_bh_rcv(struct work_struct *work)
> /* If there is an error on chunk, discard this packet. */
> if (error && chunk)
> chunk->pdiscard = 1;
> +
> + if (first_time)
> + first_time = 0;
> }
> sctp_association_put(asoc);
> }
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> index 28c070e..c9ae340 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
> @@ -153,10 +153,7 @@ static enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_violation_chunk(
> struct sctp_cmd_seq *commands);
>
> static enum sctp_ierror sctp_sf_authenticate(
> - struct net *net,
> - const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
> const struct sctp_association *asoc,
> - const union sctp_subtype type,
> struct sctp_chunk *chunk);
>
> static enum sctp_disposition __sctp_sf_do_9_1_abort(
> @@ -626,6 +623,38 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack(struct net *net,
> return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME;
> }
>
> +static bool sctp_auth_chunk_verify(struct net *net, struct sctp_chunk *chunk,
> + const struct sctp_association *asoc)
> +{
> + struct sctp_chunk auth;
> +
> + if (!chunk->auth_chunk)
> + return true;
> +
> + /* SCTP-AUTH: auth_chunk pointer is only set when the cookie-echo
> + * is supposed to be authenticated and we have to do delayed
> + * authentication. We've just recreated the association using
> + * the information in the cookie and now it's much easier to
> + * do the authentication.
> + */
> +
> + /* Make sure that we and the peer are AUTH capable */
> + if (!net->sctp.auth_enable || !asoc->peer.auth_capable)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* set-up our fake chunk so that we can process it */
> + auth.skb = chunk->auth_chunk;
> + auth.asoc = chunk->asoc;
> + auth.sctp_hdr = chunk->sctp_hdr;
> + auth.chunk_hdr = (struct sctp_chunkhdr *)
> + skb_push(chunk->auth_chunk,
> + sizeof(struct sctp_chunkhdr));
> + skb_pull(chunk->auth_chunk, sizeof(struct sctp_chunkhdr));
> + auth.transport = chunk->transport;
> +
> + return sctp_sf_authenticate(asoc, &auth) == SCTP_IERROR_NO_ERROR;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Respond to a normal COOKIE ECHO chunk.
> * We are the side that is being asked for an association.
> @@ -763,37 +792,9 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce(struct net *net,
> if (error)
> goto nomem_init;
>
> - /* SCTP-AUTH: auth_chunk pointer is only set when the cookie-echo
> - * is supposed to be authenticated and we have to do delayed
> - * authentication. We've just recreated the association using
> - * the information in the cookie and now it's much easier to
> - * do the authentication.
> - */
> - if (chunk->auth_chunk) {
> - struct sctp_chunk auth;
> - enum sctp_ierror ret;
> -
> - /* Make sure that we and the peer are AUTH capable */
> - if (!net->sctp.auth_enable || !new_asoc->peer.auth_capable) {
> - sctp_association_free(new_asoc);
> - return sctp_sf_pdiscard(net, ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);
> - }
> -
> - /* set-up our fake chunk so that we can process it */
> - auth.skb = chunk->auth_chunk;
> - auth.asoc = chunk->asoc;
> - auth.sctp_hdr = chunk->sctp_hdr;
> - auth.chunk_hdr = (struct sctp_chunkhdr *)
> - skb_push(chunk->auth_chunk,
> - sizeof(struct sctp_chunkhdr));
> - skb_pull(chunk->auth_chunk, sizeof(struct sctp_chunkhdr));
> - auth.transport = chunk->transport;
> -
> - ret = sctp_sf_authenticate(net, ep, new_asoc, type, &auth);
> - if (ret != SCTP_IERROR_NO_ERROR) {
> - sctp_association_free(new_asoc);
> - return sctp_sf_pdiscard(net, ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);
> - }
> + if (!sctp_auth_chunk_verify(net, chunk, new_asoc)) {
> + sctp_association_free(new_asoc);
> + return sctp_sf_pdiscard(net, ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);
> }
>
> repl = sctp_make_cookie_ack(new_asoc, chunk);
> @@ -1797,13 +1798,15 @@ static enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_dupcook_a(
> if (sctp_auth_asoc_init_active_key(new_asoc, GFP_ATOMIC))
> goto nomem;
>
> + if (!sctp_auth_chunk_verify(net, chunk, new_asoc))
> + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD;
> +
> /* Make sure no new addresses are being added during the
> * restart. Though this is a pretty complicated attack
> * since you'd have to get inside the cookie.
> */
> - if (!sctp_sf_check_restart_addrs(new_asoc, asoc, chunk, commands)) {
> + if (!sctp_sf_check_restart_addrs(new_asoc, asoc, chunk, commands))
> return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME;
> - }
>
> /* If the endpoint is in the SHUTDOWN-ACK-SENT state and recognizes
> * the peer has restarted (Action A), it MUST NOT setup a new
> @@ -1912,6 +1915,9 @@ static enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_dupcook_b(
> if (sctp_auth_asoc_init_active_key(new_asoc, GFP_ATOMIC))
> goto nomem;
>
> + if (!sctp_auth_chunk_verify(net, chunk, new_asoc))
> + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD;
> +
> /* Update the content of current association. */
> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_UPDATE_ASSOC, SCTP_ASOC(new_asoc));
> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_NEW_STATE,
> @@ -2009,6 +2015,9 @@ static enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_dupcook_d(
> * a COOKIE ACK.
> */
>
> + if (!sctp_auth_chunk_verify(net, chunk, asoc))
> + return SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD;
> +
> /* Don't accidentally move back into established state. */
> if (asoc->state < SCTP_STATE_ESTABLISHED) {
> sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_TIMER_STOP,
> @@ -4171,10 +4180,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_eat_fwd_tsn_fast(
> * The return value is the disposition of the chunk.
> */
> static enum sctp_ierror sctp_sf_authenticate(
> - struct net *net,
> - const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
> const struct sctp_association *asoc,
> - const union sctp_subtype type,
> struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
> {
> struct sctp_shared_key *sh_key = NULL;
> @@ -4275,7 +4281,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_eat_auth(struct net *net,
> commands);
>
> auth_hdr = (struct sctp_authhdr *)chunk->skb->data;
> - error = sctp_sf_authenticate(net, ep, asoc, type, chunk);
> + error = sctp_sf_authenticate(asoc, chunk);
> switch (error) {
> case SCTP_IERROR_AUTH_BAD_HMAC:
> /* Generate the ERROR chunk and discard the rest
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists