lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9235D6609DB808459E95D78E17F2E43D40D62045@CHN-SV-EXMX02.mchp-main.com> Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 00:02:25 +0000 From: <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com> To: <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org> CC: <andrew@...n.ch>, <rmk@...linux.org.uk>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <cphealy@...il.com>, <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>, <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>, <Nisar.Sayed@...rochip.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com> Subject: RE: [RFC net-next 4/5] net: phy: Add support for IEEE standard test modes Hi Florian, > Well, the way the code is structure is that if you call that function > with a test mode value that is not part of the standard set, it returns > -EOPNOTSUPP, so if your particular PHY driver wants to "overlay" > standard and non-standard modes, it can by using that hint. > > This should work even if we have more standard test modes in the future > because the test modes are dynamically fetched by user-space using the > ETH_GSTRINGS ioctl(). > > Does that cover what you had in mind? Basically, agree on your explanation. My idea was making genphy_set_test() more expandable for other test modes because it would be a good place to add more standard test modes later. No problem to keep current codes. Thanks. Woojung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists