[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180507165306.541bd1f2@xeon-e3>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 16:53:06 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, kubakici@...pl, jasowang@...hat.com,
loseweigh@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, aaron.f.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 2/4] net: Introduce generic failover module
On Mon, 7 May 2018 15:10:44 -0700
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com> wrote:
> +static struct net_device *net_failover_get_bymac(u8 *mac,
> + struct net_failover_ops **ops)
> +{
> + struct net_device *failover_dev;
> + struct net_failover *failover;
> +
> + spin_lock(&net_failover_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(failover, &net_failover_list, list) {
> + failover_dev = rtnl_dereference(failover->failover_dev);
> + if (ether_addr_equal(failover_dev->perm_addr, mac)) {
> + *ops = rtnl_dereference(failover->ops);
> + spin_unlock(&net_failover_lock);
> + return failover_dev;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&net_failover_lock);
> + return NULL;
> +}
This is broken if non-ethernet devices such as Infiniband are present.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists