netdev - [PATCH 5/5] xfrm: use a dedicated slab cache for struct xfrm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 May 2018 11:01:16 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] xfrm: use a dedicated slab cache for struct xfrm_state

From: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>

struct xfrm_state is rather large (768 bytes here) and therefore wastes
quite a lot of memory as it falls into the kmalloc-1024 slab cache,
leaving 256 bytes of unused memory per XFRM state object -- a net waste
of 25%.

Using a dedicated slab cache for struct xfrm_state reduces the level of
internal fragmentation to a minimum.

On my configuration SLUB chooses to create a slab cache covering 4
pages holding 21 objects, resulting in an average memory waste of ~13
bytes per object -- a net waste of only 1.6%.

In my tests this led to memory savings of roughly 2.3MB for 10k XFRM
states.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index f9d2f2233f09..f595797a20ce 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static void xfrm_state_gc_task(struct work_struct *work);
 
 static unsigned int xfrm_state_hashmax __read_mostly = 1 * 1024 * 1024;
 static __read_mostly seqcount_t xfrm_state_hash_generation = SEQCNT_ZERO(xfrm_state_hash_generation);
+static struct kmem_cache *xfrm_state_cache __ro_after_init;
 
 static DECLARE_WORK(xfrm_state_gc_work, xfrm_state_gc_task);
 static HLIST_HEAD(xfrm_state_gc_list);
@@ -451,7 +452,7 @@ static void xfrm_state_gc_destroy(struct xfrm_state *x)
 	}
 	xfrm_dev_state_free(x);
 	security_xfrm_state_free(x);
-	kfree(x);
+	kmem_cache_free(xfrm_state_cache, x);
 }
 
 static void xfrm_state_gc_task(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -563,7 +564,7 @@ struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_alloc(struct net *net)
 {
 	struct xfrm_state *x;
 
-	x = kzalloc(sizeof(struct xfrm_state), GFP_ATOMIC);
+	x = kmem_cache_alloc(xfrm_state_cache, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO);
 
 	if (x) {
 		write_pnet(&x->xs_net, net);
@@ -2307,6 +2308,10 @@ int __net_init xfrm_state_init(struct net *net)
 {
 	unsigned int sz;
 
+	if (net_eq(net, &init_net))
+		xfrm_state_cache = KMEM_CACHE(xfrm_state,
+					      SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_PANIC);
+
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&net->xfrm.state_all);
 
 	sz = sizeof(struct hlist_head) * 8;
-- 
2.14.1