netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] tools: bpftool: use PERF_SAMPLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180510172443.17238-2-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 May 2018 10:24:37 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] tools: bpftool: use PERF_SAMPLE_TIME instead of reading the clock

Ask the kernel to include sample time in each even instead of
reading the clock.  This is also more accurate because our
clock reading was done when user space would dump the buffer,
not when sample was produced.

Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/map_perf_ring.c | 17 ++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map_perf_ring.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map_perf_ring.c
index c5a2ced8552d..9ae4bb8a2cad 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map_perf_ring.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map_perf_ring.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct event_ring_info {
 
 struct perf_event_sample {
 	struct perf_event_header header;
+	u64 time;
 	__u32 size;
 	unsigned char data[];
 };
@@ -57,17 +58,9 @@ print_bpf_output(struct event_ring_info *ring, struct perf_event_sample *e)
 		__u64 id;
 		__u64 lost;
 	} *lost = (void *)e;
-	struct timespec ts;
-
-	if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts)) {
-		perror("Can't read clock for timestamp");
-		return;
-	}
 
 	if (json_output) {
 		jsonw_start_object(json_wtr);
-		jsonw_name(json_wtr, "timestamp");
-		jsonw_uint(json_wtr, ts.tv_sec * 1000000000ull + ts.tv_nsec);
 		jsonw_name(json_wtr, "type");
 		jsonw_uint(json_wtr, e->header.type);
 		jsonw_name(json_wtr, "cpu");
@@ -75,6 +68,8 @@ print_bpf_output(struct event_ring_info *ring, struct perf_event_sample *e)
 		jsonw_name(json_wtr, "index");
 		jsonw_uint(json_wtr, ring->key);
 		if (e->header.type == PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE) {
+			jsonw_name(json_wtr, "timestamp");
+			jsonw_uint(json_wtr, e->time);
 			jsonw_name(json_wtr, "data");
 			print_data_json(e->data, e->size);
 		} else if (e->header.type == PERF_RECORD_LOST) {
@@ -89,8 +84,8 @@ print_bpf_output(struct event_ring_info *ring, struct perf_event_sample *e)
 		jsonw_end_object(json_wtr);
 	} else {
 		if (e->header.type == PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE) {
-			printf("== @%ld.%ld CPU: %d index: %d =====\n",
-			       (long)ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec,
+			printf("== @%lld.%09lld CPU: %d index: %d =====\n",
+			       e->time / 1000000000ULL, e->time % 1000000000ULL,
 			       ring->cpu, ring->key);
 			fprint_hex(stdout, e->data, e->size, " ");
 			printf("\n");
@@ -185,7 +180,7 @@ static void perf_event_unmap(void *mem)
 static int bpf_perf_event_open(int map_fd, int key, int cpu)
 {
 	struct perf_event_attr attr = {
-		.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_RAW,
+		.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_RAW | PERF_SAMPLE_TIME,
 		.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE,
 		.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT,
 	};
-- 
2.17.0