[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180513075803.plrkbwmzksjnz45u@verge.net.au>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 09:58:05 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: ravb: Add support for r8a77990 SoC
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 03:59:42PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 12:18:56 +0900
>
> > Add documentation for r8a77990 compatible string to renesas ravb device
> > tree bindings documentation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
>
> I'm assuming this isn't targetted at one of my trees. Just FYI.
Hi Dave,
I think this is appropriate for net-next but if not I can take it.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
Shimoda-san,
please use "[PATCH net-next]" for non-bugfix networking updates which
are targeted at Dave's net-next tree. Bug fixes should be for "net".
Patches should of course apply cleanly to whichever tree it is targeted at.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists