| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20180514212234.2661-9-daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 23:22:34 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] bpf: add ld64 imm test cases
Add test cases where we combine semi-random imm values, mainly for testing
JITs when they have different encoding options for 64 bit immediates in
order to reduce resulting image size.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rand.h | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 142 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rand.h
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rand.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rand.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..59bf3e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rand.h
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __BPF_RAND__
+#define __BPF_RAND__
+
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <time.h>
+
+static inline uint64_t bpf_rand_mask(uint64_t mask)
+{
+ return (((uint64_t)(uint32_t)rand()) |
+ ((uint64_t)(uint32_t)rand() << 32)) & mask;
+}
+
+#define bpf_rand_ux(x, m) \
+static inline uint64_t bpf_rand_u##x(int shift) \
+{ \
+ return bpf_rand_mask((m)) << shift; \
+}
+
+bpf_rand_ux( 8, 0xffULL)
+bpf_rand_ux(16, 0xffffULL)
+bpf_rand_ux(24, 0xffffffULL)
+bpf_rand_ux(32, 0xffffffffULL)
+bpf_rand_ux(40, 0xffffffffffULL)
+bpf_rand_ux(48, 0xffffffffffffULL)
+bpf_rand_ux(56, 0xffffffffffffffULL)
+bpf_rand_ux(64, 0xffffffffffffffffULL)
+
+static inline void bpf_semi_rand_init(void)
+{
+ srand(time(NULL));
+}
+
+static inline uint64_t bpf_semi_rand_get(void)
+{
+ switch (rand() % 39) {
+ case 0: return 0x000000ff00000000ULL | bpf_rand_u8(0);
+ case 1: return 0xffffffff00000000ULL | bpf_rand_u16(0);
+ case 2: return 0x00000000ffff0000ULL | bpf_rand_u16(0);
+ case 3: return 0x8000000000000000ULL | bpf_rand_u32(0);
+ case 4: return 0x00000000f0000000ULL | bpf_rand_u32(0);
+ case 5: return 0x0000000100000000ULL | bpf_rand_u24(0);
+ case 6: return 0x800ff00000000000ULL | bpf_rand_u32(0);
+ case 7: return 0x7fffffff00000000ULL | bpf_rand_u32(0);
+ case 8: return 0xffffffffffffff00ULL ^ bpf_rand_u32(24);
+ case 9: return 0xffffffffffffff00ULL | bpf_rand_u8(0);
+ case 10: return 0x0000000010000000ULL | bpf_rand_u32(0);
+ case 11: return 0xf000000000000000ULL | bpf_rand_u8(0);
+ case 12: return 0x0000f00000000000ULL | bpf_rand_u8(8);
+ case 13: return 0x000000000f000000ULL | bpf_rand_u8(16);
+ case 14: return 0x0000000000000f00ULL | bpf_rand_u8(32);
+ case 15: return 0x00fff00000000f00ULL | bpf_rand_u8(48);
+ case 16: return 0x00007fffffffffffULL ^ bpf_rand_u32(1);
+ case 17: return 0xffff800000000000ULL | bpf_rand_u8(4);
+ case 18: return 0xffff800000000000ULL | bpf_rand_u8(20);
+ case 19: return (0xffffffc000000000ULL + 0x80000ULL) | bpf_rand_u32(0);
+ case 20: return (0xffffffc000000000ULL - 0x04000000ULL) | bpf_rand_u32(0);
+ case 21: return 0x0000000000000000ULL | bpf_rand_u8(55) | bpf_rand_u32(20);
+ case 22: return 0xffffffffffffffffULL ^ bpf_rand_u8(3) ^ bpf_rand_u32(40);
+ case 23: return 0x0000000000000000ULL | bpf_rand_u8(bpf_rand_u8(0) % 64);
+ case 24: return 0x0000000000000000ULL | bpf_rand_u16(bpf_rand_u8(0) % 64);
+ case 25: return 0xffffffffffffffffULL ^ bpf_rand_u8(bpf_rand_u8(0) % 64);
+ case 26: return 0xffffffffffffffffULL ^ bpf_rand_u40(bpf_rand_u8(0) % 64);
+ case 27: return 0x0000800000000000ULL;
+ case 28: return 0x8000000000000000ULL;
+ case 29: return 0x0000000000000000ULL;
+ case 30: return 0xffffffffffffffffULL;
+ case 31: return bpf_rand_u16(bpf_rand_u8(0) % 64);
+ case 32: return bpf_rand_u24(bpf_rand_u8(0) % 64);
+ case 33: return bpf_rand_u32(bpf_rand_u8(0) % 64);
+ case 34: return bpf_rand_u40(bpf_rand_u8(0) % 64);
+ case 35: return bpf_rand_u48(bpf_rand_u8(0) % 64);
+ case 36: return bpf_rand_u56(bpf_rand_u8(0) % 64);
+ case 37: return bpf_rand_u64(bpf_rand_u8(0) % 64);
+ default: return bpf_rand_u64(0);
+ }
+}
+
+#endif /* __BPF_RAND__ */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 275b457..a877af0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
# endif
#endif
#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
+#include "bpf_rand.h"
#include "../../../include/linux/filter.h"
#ifndef ARRAY_SIZE
@@ -152,6 +153,30 @@ static void bpf_fill_jump_around_ld_abs(struct bpf_test *self)
insn[i] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
}
+static void bpf_fill_rand_ld_dw(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = self->insns;
+ uint64_t res = 0;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ insn[i++] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0);
+ while (i < self->retval) {
+ uint64_t val = bpf_semi_rand_get();
+ struct bpf_insn tmp[2] = { BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, val) };
+
+ res ^= val;
+ insn[i++] = tmp[0];
+ insn[i++] = tmp[1];
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1);
+ }
+ insn[i++] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0);
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_1, 32);
+ insn[i++] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1);
+ insn[i] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+ res ^= (res >> 32);
+ self->retval = (uint32_t)res;
+}
+
static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{
"add+sub+mul",
@@ -11974,6 +11999,42 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 10,
},
+ {
+ "ld_dw: xor semi-random 64 bit imms, test 1",
+ .insns = { },
+ .data = { },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_rand_ld_dw,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 4090,
+ },
+ {
+ "ld_dw: xor semi-random 64 bit imms, test 2",
+ .insns = { },
+ .data = { },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_rand_ld_dw,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 2047,
+ },
+ {
+ "ld_dw: xor semi-random 64 bit imms, test 3",
+ .insns = { },
+ .data = { },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_rand_ld_dw,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 511,
+ },
+ {
+ "ld_dw: xor semi-random 64 bit imms, test 4",
+ .insns = { },
+ .data = { },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_rand_ld_dw,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 5,
+ },
};
static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)
@@ -12346,5 +12407,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
+ bpf_semi_rand_init();
return do_test(unpriv, from, to);
}
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists