netdev - Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH net-next 2/2] sctp: add sctp_make_op_error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180514114720.GA25280@yexl-desktop>
Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 19:47:20 +0800
From:   Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, kbuild-all@...org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH net-next 2/2] sctp: add
 sctp_make_op_error_limited and reuse inner functions

On 05/14, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 03:40:53PM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>> >> config: x86_64-randconfig-x006-201817 (attached as .config)
>> >> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
>> >> reproduce:
>> >>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> >>         make ARCH=x86_64
>> >>
>> >> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> >>
>> >>    net//sctp/sm_make_chunk.c: In function 'sctp_make_op_error_limited':
>> >> >> net//sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1260:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'sctp_mtu_payload'; did you mean 'sctp_do_peeloff'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> >>      size = sctp_mtu_payload(sp, size, sizeof(struct sctp_errhdr));
>> >>             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> >>             sctp_do_peeloff
>> >>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>> >
>> >Seems the test didn't pick up the MTU refactor patchset yet.
>>
>> Do you mean your patchset require MTU refactor patchset as prerequisites?
>
>Yes.

Then it is recommended to use '--base' option of git format-patch, it would record
the base tree info in the first patch or cover letter, 0day bot would apply your
patchset to right base according to it.

Thanks,
Xiaolong
>
>Thanks,
>Marcelo