netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Fix route append and replace use cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <458fe36b-355a-f11e-32b4-8a139c26a298@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 23:54:08 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...orbit.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Thomas.Winter@...iedtelesis.co.nz,
        idosch@...lanox.com, sharpd@...ulusnetworks.com,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Fix route append and replace
 use cases

On 5/14/18 11:21 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 07:51:05PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> This patch set fixes a few append and replace uses cases for IPv6 and
>> adds test cases that codifies the expectations of how append and replace
>> are expected to work.
> 
> Nood question: what commit does this apply on top of please.  I
> attempted to apply the set on top of net-next
> 
> 	commit (961423f9fcbc Merge branch 'sctp-Introduce-sctp_flush_ctx')
> 
> patch 4 and 5 have merge conflicts (I stopped at 5).

Base commit is:

commit 289e1f4e9e4a09c73a1c0152bb93855ea351ccda
Author: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Date:   Sun May 13 21:48:30 2018 +0200

    net: ipv4: ipconfig: fix unused variable



I don't see 961423f9fcbc in any tree.